Previously, we explored the inner understanding of Perek Beis, in which the raging nations represent the forces within a person that resist rootedness, obligation, and alignment with Hashem.

We now turn to the historical perspective of the mizmor. Here, that same struggle appears not within the soul, but on the battlefield of Dovid HaMelech’s life, as the nations rise against his newly established kingship.

In the next essay, we will turn to the future vision of Gog u’Magog, where this resistance reaches its final form.

To understand the historical context of the perek, it is worth first returning to the events described in Shmuel Beis, perek 5.

The Navi tells us that all the shevatim came to Dovid in Chevron and declared him Melech. This was the third stage of Dovid’s anointing. First, Shmuel anointed him privately. Then Shevet Yehudah accepted him as Melech. Finally, the ziknei Yisrael came to Chevron and accepted him as Melech over all of Klal Yisrael.

From there, Dovid went to capture Yerushalayim from the Yevusi. Against all predictions, he captured Tzion, which is Ir Dovid.

Rav Moshe Dovid Vali (Ramdu) explains that Dovid’s conquest was not only military. He was breaking through the barriers of the kelipah represented by its inhabitants and bringing in a new flow of kedushah. Once he successfully did so, the city became associated with him and was called Ir Dovid.

At that point, the Plishtim heard that Dovid had been anointed as Melech over Yisrael, so they set out to capture him. The Plishtim were the ongoing enemy of Klal Yisrael, and Dovid’s rise to Malchus immediately drew their attention.

Ramdu explains that the external forces seek to overpower the head of kedushah at its beginning, before it strengthens itself and overpowers them. They attack precisely when the new center of kedushah is beginning to emerge.

Dovid then went toward the metzudah, which, according to the Meiri, was Adullam.

Dovid was therefore returning to the place of his roots in order to reflect, meditate, and gather strength before the next stage of his battle.

In the meantime, the Plishtim spread out in Emek Refaim.

Ramdu explains that the name itself hints to their inner state. They gathered in a place called Refaim, a name associated with weakness and death, as though they were already like corpses lying in the grave. Hashem then told Dovid to go up, because He would deliver the Plishtim into his hand.

Dovid went to battle the Plishtim at Baal Peratzim, which the mefarshim identify with Emek Refaim, and he won the battle.

The Plishtim then regrouped in Emek Refaim. Ramdu explains that the external forces are like grasshoppers placed in a jar: they climb up the walls, fall back down, and then return to climb and fall again.1

This time, Hashem told Dovid to attack them from behind and assured him that He would go before him. Dovid kept Hashem’s command, waited, and was rewarded. Shaul, by contrast, did not wait. He acted too quickly and therefore lost out.

It was against this background that the mizmor was written. Most mefarshim understand that Dovid himself said it, while the Meiri notes that it may have been composed by another singer about Dovid.

Either way, these two battles with the Plishtim capture the historical form of the struggle at the heart of Perek Beis: the clash between Malchus Beis Dovid and the forces that rise to oppose kedushah as soon as it begins to take root.

למה רגשו גוים ולאמים יהגו ריק

Why do the nations rumble and gather against Dovid, and why do kingdoms plot empty things in their hearts?

According to the Meiri, רגשו means that they made a loud commotion, while יהגו ריק means that they spoke haughty words that were ultimately empty. Their plans sounded powerful, but they were built on nothing.

This opening question is Dovid’s response to the seemingly irrational hostility that rises against him as soon as his Malchus begins to take shape. According to this contextual perspective, the perek describes Dovid’s political and spiritual struggle as he becomes Melech over Klal Yisrael.

The pasuk mentions both גוים and לאמים. The Malbim explains that these are not redundant terms. גוים refers to nations bound by geography, while לאמים refers to groups bound by a shared ideology or religion. Together, they teach that the opposition to Dovid came from every kind of collective force: political, cultural, and ideological.

The Sforno adds that their agitation was not rational. It was emotional, impulsive, and empty. They were responding less to a real threat than to the rise of kedushah and the breaking of the kelipah, which they could not tolerate.

יִתְיַצְּבוּ  מַלְכֵי־אֶרֶץ וְרוֹזְנִים נוֹסְדוּ־יָחַד עַל־ה׳ וְעַל־מְשִׁיחוֹ

Why did the kings of the land stand up, and why did the princes take counsel together against Hashem and against His Mashiach?

The commotion now becomes organized opposition. The Meiri explains that מלכי ארץ refers to the Plishtim, who, in their arrogance, viewed themselves as kings, while ורוזנים נוסדו יחד means that the princes advised one another. Their counsel was directed על ה׳ ועל משיחו, against Hashem and against His anointed one, referring to Dovid, who had been anointed by Hashem’s command.

נְנַתְּקָה אֶת־מוֹסְרוֹתֵימוֹ וְנַשְׁלִיכָה מִמֶּנּוּ עֲבֹתֵימוֹ

They said: “Let us break their restraints and cast off their cords from us.”

The opposition now gives voice to its goal. Rashi explains מוֹסְרוֹתֵימוֹ as the bands with which the yoke is tied. The nations are declaring their desire to overthrow the anointed one, the Mashiach, and prevent him from acting.

The Meiri explains that this was not directed only toward Dovid. It was directed toward all of Yisrael, who had unanimously accepted Dovid as Melech and were therefore bound together with him.

The language of bonds and cords can also be understood on a deeper level. When the nations say that they want to “break the restraints” and “cast off the cords,” this can be understood as an attempt to disconnect the Jewish people from mitzvos. One explanation divides mitzvos into three categories, chukim, mishpatim, and eidos, and understands the “cord” as a three-stranded bond tying Klal Yisrael to Hashem. The nations seek to sever that connection entirely, removing both belief and practice.2

This brings us to the central question of whom the mizmor is describing. On one hand, the previous pasuk speaks of מלכי ארץ and רוזנים, kings and princes, which sounds broader than the Plishtim alone. However, according to the understanding that the mizmor refers to Dovid, מלכי ארץ and רוזנים must be understood as referring to the Plishtim, and possibly to other allies who joined them.

The broader historical context makes this easier to understand. For hundreds of years, from the days of the Shoftim through Shaul and into the beginning of Dovid’s reign, the Plishtim had dominated the Jewish people. Different rulers had fought them, but no one, including Shaul, had fully defeated them. Now the Plishtim saw that the Jewish people had a Melech. They feared that Dovid would take over the world, or at least the world they had controlled until now, and that they would become subordinate to Yisrael. This is why they went to war against Dovid.

Dovid HaMelech now turns from the noise of the nations to the response from Shamayim:

יוֹשֵׁב בַּשָּׁמַיִם יִשְׂחָק אֲדֹ-נָי יִלְעַג־לָמוֹ

The Dweller in Heaven laughs; Hashem mocks them.

The Meiri explains that this is a metaphor, like someone who mocks something that is considered absolutely nothing in his eyes. Hashem’s response is described as laughter, not because the situation is humorous, but because the rebellion is futile. The Plishtim imagine that they are rising against Dovid, but from the perspective of Shamayim, their entire plan is already empty.

אָז יְדַבֵּר אֵלֵימוֹ בְאַפּוֹ וּבַחֲרוֹנוֹ יְבַהֲלֵמוֹ

Then He speaks to them in His anger, and in His fury He terrifies them.

The heavenly laughter now gives way to judgment. The Meiri explains that this means Hashem will place them in Dovid’s hand, and their attack will end in defeat.

The Malbim distinguishes between two forms of Divine anger. The emotional element of Divine anger is called אף, whereas the expression of Divine anger through punishment is called חרון. In this pasuk, Hashem first responds to their rebellion with anger, and then that anger takes form in action against them.

And what is the speech?

וַאֲנִי נָסַכְתִּי מַלְכִּי עַל־צִיּוֹן הַר־קָדְשִׁי

“I have installed My king upon Tzion, My holy mountain.”

The Meiri explains that this is Dovid speaking about himself. How did they think they could overthrow me, when I am among the servants of Hashem, when I have declared and unified His name, and when I have elevated and exalted His kingship upon Tzion, His holy mountain?

Rashi, however, explains that Dovid is speaking as though Hashem Himself is speaking: I have appointed My king, Dovid, upon Tzion, My holy mountain. The question is therefore direct: למה רגשתם? Why have you gathered together? How can you think of canceling his kingship?

Rav Arnie Wittenstein explains that Hashem’s interaction with our world is deeply connected to His will to give mankind, both personally and nationally, bechirah, free will. The Plishtim assumed that the old balance of power would continue. They had fought Bnei Yisrael before, and they expected this confrontation to follow the same pattern.

That changed when Dovid became Melech.

Hashem mocks them because they do not realize that the entire reality has changed. They do not understand who is now king, and they do not understand his deep connection to Tzion, Hashem’s holy mountain. This connection points toward the Mikdash, the great national project of bringing Hashem’s presence into the world. Dovid is deeply bound to that vision, and therefore the strategies that worked in the past will no longer work.

While the nations try to rid themselves of the “burden” of living under the moral authority of a Jewish king, Hashem proclaims His love for the very king they despise. The Heavenly King appoints Dovid over His people, and Dovid proclaims Hashem as King over the world.

That is the meaning of Hashem’s laughter. The Plishtim see Dovid through the categories of the past, but from the perspective of Shamayim, his kingship represents the beginning of a new order: Malchus Beis Dovid taking root on Tzion.

אֲסַפְּרָה אֶל־חֹק ה׳ אָמַר־אֵלַי בְּנִי אַתָּה אֲנִי הַיּוֹם יְלִדְתִּיךָ

I, Dovid, will speak of this as an established decree, something I have received to tell and make known.

The phrase אספרה אל חוק introduces a major idea. A chok is something fixed, established, and unchangeable. Throughout Tanach, a chok can describe realities built into the structure of creation itself, such as the cycle of day and night. In this sense, Dovid’s kingship is part of the Divine order. The same way a person cannot reverse nature, he cannot overturn Hashem’s decision to make Dovid king.

The Meiri explains that this is also an expression of humility. Dovid is not presenting himself as naturally worthy of kingship. He is saying that his Malchus exists because Hashem decreed it. His kingship begins neither with ambition, nor with strength, nor with personal entitlement. It begins with Hashem’s word.3

That is the meaning of:

ה׳ אמר אלי בני אתה

“Hashem said to me: You are My son.”

The language of sonship here is central, but it must be understood through the framework of our mesorah. It signifies Malchus, national mission, and a profound attachment with Hashem. Dovid is called Hashem’s son because he is the appointed Melech of Klal Yisrael, and Klal Yisrael itself is similarly called בני בכורי ישראל and בנים אתם לה׳ אלקיכם. In the Jewish understanding, the pasuk describes the covenantal role of the Jewish king, who carries the mission of Hashem’s people and acts as His appointed representative in history.

The Meiri connects this to the broader language of Tanach, where Dovid and Shlomo are described in father-son terms in relation to Hashem. The king of Israel is not only a political ruler. He is the one through whom Klal Yisrael’s national mission is expressed. His authority is therefore bound to responsibility. To be called Hashem’s son means to carry Hashem’s name into history.4

The next words deepen this further:

אני היום ילדתיך

“Today I have begotten you.”

The Meiri explains that ילדתיך means that Hashem raised Dovid and made him fit for this role. He also suggests that this may refer to the point from which Dovid became blessed with Ruach HaKodesh. The term ילדתיך is therefore understood as a process of spiritual development rather than a biological event. Hashem brought Dovid into the fullness of his capacity to carry out his covenantal role.

The Vilna Gaon5 and the Zohar6 take this language into a deeper developmental framework. They explain that this pasuk refers to a moment of spiritual completion in Dovid’s life, specifically at age thirteen, when a person reaches full spiritual capacity through nefesh, ruach, and neshamah. At that point, Dovid had become fully formed and capable of fulfilling his role. The יום, the “today,” is therefore not only the day of appointment. It is the day on which the inner structure of the person becomes capable of carrying the outer mission.

This creates an important bridge between the historical and kabbalistic perspective. On the historical level, Dovid is being established as Melech. On the inner level, he is becoming the vessel capable of carrying Malchus. The external kingship becomes possible because the inner person has been prepared for it.

Being called “son” therefore means more than affection. It signifies responsibility and representation. Dovid, like Klal Yisrael as a whole, carries the role of representing Hashem in the world and bearing responsibility for others. This sense of responsibility is reinforced in other pesukim in Tehillim, where Dovid describes himself as someone upon whom the entire nation depends. His leadership is not only authority, but also burden. He acts on behalf of all of Klal Yisrael.

This also explains why Dovid’s Malchus is bound to Tzion. His task is not only to win battles or govern a nation. Dovid is the ultimate expression of man’s potential to be formed by Hashem and then act within history. He is given the task of helping mold and guide the Jewish people toward their highest destiny: bringing Yedias Hashem into the world and revealing the Shechinah through the Mikdash.

This principle applies beyond Dovid as well. Every person has to know that he is a child of Hashem and that his mission is purposeful. Dovid was prepared for his task, and each of us is entrusted with our own. Hashem, so to speak, rejoiced on the day He anointed Dovid and gave him his mission, and He rejoices in the mission He gives each of us.

We should try to live each day with the sense that our mission has been given to us anew, with the freshness of:

אני היום ילדתיך

“Today I have begotten you.”

שְׁאַל מִמֶּנִּי וְאֶתְּנָה גוֹיִם נַחֲלָתֶךָ וַאֲחֻזָּתְךָ אַפְסֵי־אָרֶץ

“Ask of Me, and I will give nations as your inheritance, and the ends of the earth as your possession.”

Hashem tells Dovid that whenever he goes out to battle his enemies, he should turn to Him in tefillah. If Dovid asks, Hashem will give the nations into his hand, extending even to the ends of the earth.

This is a critical part of Dovid’s Malchus. His power does not come from military strength alone. It comes from the ability to ask. The Melech of Klal Yisrael is not meant to act as an independent force, because Jewish kingship is real only when it remains attached to Hashem. Dovid’s strength comes from knowing that he depends on the One who sent him.

תְּרֹעֵם בְּשֵׁבֶט בַּרְזֶל כִּכְלִי יוֹצֵר תְּנַפְּצֵם

“You will break them with a rod of iron; like a potter’s vessel, you will shatter them.”

The nations imagine themselves as powerful, but before Dovid they are as fragile as a potter’s vessel. Hashem gives Dovid the strength to break their rebellion completely, exposing how weak the Plishtim’s attempt to bring him down had been all along.

וְעַתָּה מְלָכִים הַשְׂכִּילוּ הִוָּסְרוּ שֹׁפְטֵי אָרֶץ׃

Dovid now turns to the nations and proclaims: “And now, kings, be wise; act intelligently. Be chastened, judges of the earth. Listen carefully, so that you will not need to be rebuked.”

After describing their rebellion and its inevitable defeat, Dovid turns directly to the rulers themselves. Rashi explains that the Jewish prophets are merciful. They rebuke the nations in order to turn them away from evil, because Hashem extends His hand to the wicked as well as to the righteous. The Meiri explains that Dovid is telling them to recognize that his kingship has come from Hashem. How, then, can they think to cancel it?

This is where the mizmor shifts from description to warning and guidance. Dovid urges the nations to act wisely and accept discipline. Rashi emphasizes that this is an act of mercy, as opposed to a threat. Dovid does not seek conflict for its own sake. He is telling them that if they persist, they will bring destruction upon themselves.

עבְדוּ אֶת־ה׳ בְּיִרְאָה וְגִילוּ בִּרְעָדָה׃

“Serve Hashem with awe, and rejoice with trembling.”

Dovid now teaches the nations what true submission to Hashem looks like. Rashi and the Meiri explain עבדו את ה׳ ביראה to mean that they should stand before Hashem with humility. וגילו ברעדה means that they will rejoice in having served Him properly when trembling overtakes those who rebelled against Him, as the pasuk says, אחזה רעדה חנפים.7

The Meiri also suggests other explanations. It can mean that they should show joy even in that which causes them to tremble, since this too is the will of Hashem. Alternatively, it means that even their success should be received as something given by Hashem. They may rejoice in it, but only with trembling, knowing that the same Hashem who gave it can also take it away.

The pasuk itself holds together two emotions that seem to pull in opposite directions. Yirah without joy can become heavy and disconnected, while joy without yirah can become shallow and without boundaries. A real relationship with Hashem requires both. A person must be able to rejoice before Hashem while still trembling before the seriousness of standing in His presence.

נַשְּׁקוּ־בַר פֶּן־יֶאֱנַף  וְתֹאבְדוּ דֶרֶךְ כִּי־יִבְעַר כִּמְעַט אַפּוֹ אַשְׁרֵי כּל־חוֹסֵי בוֹ׃

Equip yourselves with purity of heart, lest He grow angry and you lose the way. For in a brief moment His anger may flare, and, in that moment, the praise of all those who take refuge in Him will become clear.

The final section, especially נשקו בר, is a call to embrace purity and align with Hashem rather than continue rebelling. The closing message is simple: those who take refuge in Hashem are ultimately fortunate, while those who oppose Him lose their way.

נשקו בר is a difficult phrase. One approach understands נשקו as a language of desire, and בר as clarity. According to this, the pasuk means: desire clarity. The Targum understands it as a call to learn carefully, to learn the lessons of Torah so that they will not be punished and Hashem will not need to destroy them.

The Meiri explains it differently. נשקו is from the language of weapons, and בר means purity or cleanliness. The phrase means: wear purity like armor. Arm yourselves with cleanliness and innocence. This means becoming a tzaddik, doing the right thing, and making sure one is aligned.

Otherwise, ותאבדו דרך, you will lose the way and become misaligned. The Meiri explains that this is like a person who loses his path and no longer knows where to turn. Once a person fights what Hashem is building, he may still be moving, but he no longer knows where he is going.

The perek ends:

אשרי כל חוסי בו

Fortunate are all those who lean on Him, meaning those who take refuge in Him.

The ending still has a tone of instruction. Dovid is not only describing what will happen to those who oppose Hashem. He is still teaching them how to turn back. That belongs to our world, the world of bechirah, where a person can still listen, learn, and choose differently.

This historical perspective of the mizmor therefore ends where the inner perspective ended as well. When the world tries to pull itself away from Hashem, the only sane place to be is closer to Him. Perek Beis begins with noise, rebellion, and resistance, but it ends with refuge. The nations rage, kings scheme, and empires imagine themselves powerful, yet the final word belongs to those who know where to stand: אשרי כל חוסי בו.

Leave a comment

Everyone wants the rewards of alignment. Far fewer people want the roots that make it possible.

Chazal teach that there is not an absolute division between the first two chapters of Tehillim. Perek Aleph and Perek Beis are, in some sense, one unit. The Gemara1 notes that this unit begins with אשרי and ends with אשרי, Perek Aleph begins with אשרי האיש, and Perek Beis concludes with אשרי כל חוסי בו.

The Gemara continues that any mizmor of Tehillim that begins with אשרי and ends with אשרי was especially beloved to Dovid HaMelech. Tosafos2 asks why Chazal state this as a general rule if this is the only place in Tehillim that follows that exact pattern.

The Rashba3 explains that the point is broader. It does not have to be specifically אשרי. Rather, when a section concludes in the same way that it begins, it creates a fuller form of praise. The Rashba adds that this is the basis for the structure of many berachos, whose endings reflect their openings.

The Chasam Sofer4 adds that this pattern is embedded in the Torah itself. The Torah opens with בראשית, which contains the letters of אשרי, and closes with ישראל, which also contains the letters of אשרי. In other words, אשרי frames these opening perakim of Tehillim, as well as Chamisha Chumshei Torah.

The Ben Yehoyada5 explains the deeper meaning of אשרי. The letters of אשרי can be rearranged to spell ראשי, “my head.” The head symbolizes chochma, and life is drawn from chochmah, as the pasuk says, והחכמה תחיה בעליה. The Ben Yehoyada brings from the Arizal that illness comes through a withdrawal of the light of chochmah from a person. Therefore, when Dovid HaMelech opened and closed mizmorim with אשרי, he was drawing down the light of chochmah, which is the source of life.

This is especially fitting for Dovid, who constantly sought life because לית ליה מגרמיה כלום, he had nothing of his own. He therefore cried, in a sense, ראשי ראשי, drawing from the light of chochmah through the word אשרי. The Ben Yehoyada adds that this is why Tehillim is uniquely associated with drawing life and healing to the sick.

He then answers Tosafos’ question and explains that when Chazal said the mizmor “ends with אשרי” does not have to mean the actual end of the mizmor. Rather, the point is that אשרי appears twice within the same section. That repetition itself shows that the section was beloved. He gives examples from Perek 32, where the perek begins אשרי נשוי פשע כסוי חטאה and then continues אשרי אדם לא יחשוב ה׳ לו עון, and from Perek 119, which begins אשרי תמימי דרך and continues אשרי נצרי עדתיו.

This itself suggests that the opening and closing אשרי are a key to understanding the unique structure of these two perakim. It frames these two perakim as a movement of life. Perek Aleph describes the person rooted in Torah, drawing life like a tree planted by streams of water. Perek Beis shows what happens when that life-force is challenged by everything that wants to cut it off from its source.

The Be’er Avraham, Rav Avraham ben HaGra, explains this division in the name of his father, the Vilna Gaon. Dovid begins Tehillim by speaking about alignment on the individual level. He describes the person who does not follow the advice of the wicked, does not stand in the path of sinners, and does not sit among scoffers. He becomes rooted, like a tree planted by streams of water.

Perek Beis then moves from the individual to the global, from micro to macro. Once spiritual alignment enters the world, it does not remain private. It begins to shape a people, and anything that shapes Klal Yisrael will eventually be opposed by the nations around them.

The Meiri makes a similar point from a different angle. He explains that this does not mean that the two chapters are literally one mizmor. In all accurate texts of Tehillim throughout history, he notes, they appear as two separate chapters. Rather, Chazal mean that they form one thematic unit. Perek Beis grows out of Perek Aleph.

In the first mizmor, we explained that the central theme is spiritual alignment. At first glance, that does not seem to fit Perek Beis, which speaks about raging nations, kings, rulers, rebellion, and war.

I would suggest that Dovid is showing us two sides of the same reality.

Perek Aleph describes the side of alignment that can be seen. It is the person who becomes like a tree planted by streams of water. He has fruit and leaves, so his life produces something real.

Perek Beis reveals the side that is not immediately visible. While a tree grows upward, it also grows downward. Before it can stand tall above the ground, it must send roots deep beneath the surface. Those roots are hidden, but they are resilient and are what allow the tree to survive the wind, the storm, and even the axe. A tree may be cut down, but if the roots remain alive, it can grow again.

Dovid understood that alignment is not only a revealed state. It is also hidden rootedness. It exists in the visible world of action, speech, and personality, but it also exists in the inner world of attachment, emotion, and spiritual structure. This can be understood through the language of the sefiros, or in simpler human terms, through the inner life of a person who remains connected even when external forces rise against him.

The Meiri brings a deeper understanding of this mizmor before turning to what he considers the more literal meaning, which follows the events of Dovid’s life. According to this first reading, Perek Beis is not only about nations and kings outside of us, it is about the forces that oppose alignment itself.

Perek Aleph ends by telling us that ודרך רשעים תאבד, the way of the wicked will perish. Perek Beis begins by showing us what wickedness does before it disappears - it gathers together to plot different ways to disrupt the alignment between Hashem and His children.

There are three ways to understand the resistance to this alignment as described in our perek. From an inner perspective, it describes the forces that resist alignment within the person himself. From a historical perspective, it describes the nations who rose against Dovid HaMelech after he became king. Finally, from the future-redemption perspective, it describes Gog u’Magog and the final rebellion against Hashem and His Mashiach.

Let us take it one at a time. The Meiri explains the inner perspective.

למה רגשו גוים ולאמים יהגו־ריק. יתיצבו  מלכי־ארץ ורוזנים נוסדו־יחד על־ה׳ ועל־משיחו

The perek begins:

למה רגשו גוים
“Why have the nations gathered?”

The Meiri explains this as follows, since the path of wisdom has already been laid out in Perek Aleph, why do those who chase the successes of this world become so agitated? These are the people called מלכי ארץ, “kings of the earth,” because their entire world is built around earthly success. They pursue power, status, control, and the imagined permanence of this world.

When they attain these imagined successes, they begin to speak על ה׳ ועל משיחו, against Hashem and against His Mashiach. According to the Meiri, משיחו refers to the perfected chacham, the spiritually complete person who is anointed with Hashem’s holy oil.

This person is called anointed because he carries a higher calling. He is not living randomly nor is he simply reacting to life. He has been drawn into the service of Hashem and shaped by it.

The world resists a person who is aligned because the world is built on misalignment. Often, an aligned person does not need to say a word. His very existence exposes the emptiness of a life built only on appetite, ambition, and ego. This emptiness is what the mizmor is referring to - ולאומים יהגו ריק

This is a direct continuation of Perek Aleph. There, Dovid described the rasha as chaff blown by the wind. Here, he describes what that chaff sounds like before the wind carries it away. They may sound powerful and appear successful. But if their entire world is severed from Hashem, then beneath all the noise is emptiness.

There is something about a truly rooted person that unsettles the unrooted.

The nations therefore say:

ננתקה את־מוסרותימו ונשליכה ממנו עבתימו. יושב בשמים ישחק אדני ילעג־למו. אז ידבר אלימו באפו ובחרונו יבהלמו. ואני נסכתי מלכי על־ציון הר־קדשי.

They go so far as to say:

ננתקה את מוסרותימו
“Let us tear off their restraints.”

The Meiri explains that this means casting off the yoke of Malchus Shamayim and the yoke of mitzvos.

In other words, the resistance is to the idea of believing in Hashem as well as the idea that a person’s life is supposed to be tied to something above himself.

The fantasy of freedom is having no yoke. The tragedy is becoming chaff.

This is not exactly an ancient problem. A lot of people today are allergic to authority. They do not want anyone telling them what to do, but more than that, they do not want to belong deeply enough for anyone to have the right to challenge them. They do not want a rav or a rebbe. They prefer a minyan over a shul, because a minyan asks very little of you. You can show up, daven, leave, and remain untouched. Nobody has to know you, guide you, correct you, or ask whether the version of yourself you are protecting is actually the person you are meant to become.

There is something deeply familiar about ננתקה את מוסרותימו. It is the inner voice that says, “I do not want to be tied down. I do not want to answer to anything higher than my own will.”

Dovid HaMelech teaches the opposite. A person with no ties may seem free, but he is loose, movable, and eventually weightless. A tree is not alive despite its roots, but because of them. The roots may seem like they trap the tree, while in truth they hold it in place, feed it, and allow it to survive the wind.

The same is true of Torah and mitzvos. They are not ropes that trap the soul. They are the rooted attachments that keep a person connected to Hashem, to purpose, to truth, and to his own deepest self. Some people see those ties as something to tear away. Dovid sees them as the source of life.

That is why Hashem’s response is laughter:

יושב בשמים ישחק
“He Who sits in Heaven laughs.”

The Meiri explains this as a metaphor. Hashem laughs because their success is not real success and their power is not real power. It is temporary, fragile, and absurd. It is a branch declaring independence from the tree.

In the end:

אז ידבר אלימו באפו ובחרונו יבהלמו
“Then He will speak to them in His anger, and in His fury He will terrify them.”

And then Hashem says about the perfected person:

ואני נסכתי מלכי על־ציון הר־קדשי
“I have installed My king upon Zion, My holy mountain.”

According to this first pshat in the Meiri, this refers to the perfected person, the one aligned with Hashem. He becomes connected to ציון הר קדשי, the place of ultimate spiritual perfection.

This is the opposite of מלכי ארץ. They are kings of earth, while he is connected to the mountain of holiness. They seek imagined power, while he seeks Divine attachment. They want to tear off the restraints, while he understands that those very restraints are what make him real.

The aligned person then says:

אספרה אל חוק ה׳ אמר אלי בני אתה אני היום ילדתיך
“I will tell of the decree: Hashem said to me, ‘You are My son; today I have begotten you.’”

The Meiri explains that this refers to the perfected person’s closeness to Hashem, in the manner of the pasuk, הוא יקראני אבי אתה, “He will call Me: You are my Father”6. The language of birth is a metaphor for spiritual formation. A person who becomes aligned with Hashem begins to reflect Him according to his ability and is, in a sense, born into a new level of existence.

This is similar to the way the Tomer Devorah understands לשארית נחלתו. Klal Yisrael is not merely attached to Hashem from the outside; we are bound to Him with the closeness of she’er basar, like one’s own flesh.

This is the opposite of the earlier rebellion. The nations wanted to sever the connection with Hashem in order to become free. The aligned person discovers that real freedom comes from being formed by Hashem. He is not less himself because he is connected; he becomes more himself because he is connected.

From there, Hashem says:

שאל ממני ואתנה גוים נחלתך ואחזתך אפסי־ארץ. תרעם בשבט ברזל ככלי יוצר תנפצם. ועתה מלכים השכילו הוסרו שפטי ארץ. עבדו את־ה׳ ביראה וגילו ברעדה. נשקו־בר פן־יאנף  ותאבדו דרך כי־יבער כמעט אפו אשרי כל־חוסי בו {פ}

The Meiri explains שאל ממני, “Ask of Me,” to mean that the wise person, the truly aligned person, is able to rule over others. This does not only mean formal power, rather it means that inner alignment creates influence. A person who governs himself properly becomes capable of guiding others. Real power is not the ability to throw off restraint. Real power is the ability to be tied to the right thing so deeply that nothing lower can dominate you.

The perek then tells us that the success of those who resist Hashem will come to an end:

תרעם בשבט ברזל
“You shall break them with an iron rod.”

But even then, the perek does not end with destruction. It turns back to instruction:

ועתה מלכים השכילו הוסרו שפטי ארץ
“And now, kings, understand; be disciplined, judges of the earth.”

Even the kings of earth are told that they can still understand. They can still learn. They can still redirect themselves. As it says:

עבדו את ה׳ ביראה וגילו ברעדה
“Serve Hashem with awe, and rejoice with trembling.”

The Meiri explains this as a call to stand before Hashem with humility. Humility means recognizing that all success comes from Him and can be taken by Him.

This may also be why the pasuk holds together two emotions that seem to pull in opposite directions: עבדו את ה׳ ביראה וגילו ברעדה. Avodas Hashem is not flat. It is not joy without seriousness, and it is not fear without hope. Real closeness to Hashem means learning how to hold both at once. A person can rejoice, but that joy must know how fragile success is. He can tremble, but that trembling must still know that Hashem is near.

Joy without humility becomes ego, and ego eventually becomes rebellion.

Finally:

נשקו בר פן יאנף ותאבדו דרך כי יבער כמעט אפו אשרי כל חוסי בו
“Arm yourselves with purity, lest He become angry and you lose the way; for His anger may soon burn. Fortunate are all who take refuge in Him.”

The Meiri explains נשקו בר as “arm yourselves with purity.” The weapon against rebellion is not more noise. It is purity, innocence, and cleanliness of soul.

A person loses his way when he tears off the bonds that were meant to guide him. Once he removes the yoke of Torah and mitzvos and severs his connection to Hashem, he may still be moving, but he no longer knows where he is going.

When the rootless begin to fall, the task is not to fall with them. The task is to remain aligned and deepen the roots. The more those roots push through the hard and stubborn ground of the inner world, the more alive the tree becomes above ground. The hidden work beneath the surface is what allows the visible life above ground to bear fruit.

The perek ends with an eternal message of return: no matter how disconnected a person may feel, he can always come back and take refuge in Him.

אשרי כל חוסי בו

This is the inner perspective of Perek Beis. The world outside us rages because something inside us also resists being rooted. The solution to both the micro and the macro is deeper attachment amidst the temptation to escape.

Note: This project is developing as I continue learning, and I may update this post as new sources or clearer understandings emerge. In the next post, I will explore the historical understanding of this mizmor, centered on Dovid HaMelech and the Plishtim. In the third post, I will explore the future perspective of Gog u’Magog. Please share any feedback, questions, corrections, or comments in the comments section below.

Thank you for learning along with me.

Leave a comment

Tehillim The Language Of The Soul

309KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Download

As we explained in the introduction, Tehillim gives expression to every state of the human soul. It is a structure that shows us from the very start , how a person should be aligned spiritually.

Tehillim begins:

“אַשְׁרֵי־הָאִישׁ אֲשֶׁר לֹא הָלַךְ בַּעֲצַת רְשָׁעִים וּבְדֶרֶךְ חַטָּאִים לֹא עָמָד וּבְמוֹשַׁב לֵצִים לֹא יָשָׁב”

The Targum translates Ashrei as טוביה דגבר, “the good of man.” A person is considered good when he is spiritually aligned.

Rav Aharon Kotler1 explains that the continuation of the pasuk teaches that even when a person is spiritually aligned, he must remain cognizant of his surroundings. The moment that alignment weakens, he begins to slide down a slippery slope.

Rav Elchanan Wasserman2 adds that a person cannot assume that nothing will happen to him. One must always be careful to maintain that alignment.

It is interesting that Dovid HaMelech chose to begin Tehillim in a negative tense. Instead of describing that one is fortunate to walk with tzaddikim, stand with the up…

Read more

This project is an attempt to understand Tehillim more deeply. Tehillim is a central part of Jewish life, with its perakim forming much of our tefillah and its pesukim shaping our songs of yearning and inspiration.

While we do not necessarily know the precise order in which Tehillim was written, nor the authorship of every chapter, the order we have is rooted in our mesorah. There are ten expressions of praise found throughout Tehillim—ניצוח, ניגון, מזמור, שיר, הלל, תפילה, ברכה, הודאה, אשרי, and הללויה—each reflecting a different mode of song, prayer, or spiritual expression.

This structure corresponds to the ten primary contributors to Tehillim, aside from Dovid Hamelech: Adam, Avraham, Malki Tzedek, Asaf, Heiman, Yedusun, the three sons of Korach—Asir, Elkana, and AviAsaf—and Moshe Rabbeinu…

Read more